CompuServe v. Cyber - Anastasia McCleary(pg 120 SATL CompuServe Inc v Cyber Promotions Inc United States District for the Southern District of Ohio 962

CompuServe v. Cyber - Anastasia McCleary(pg 120 SATL...

This preview shows page 1 out of 1 page.

Anastasia McCleary (pg. 120 SATL) CompuServe, Inc. v. Cyber Promotions, Inc. United States District for the Southern District of Ohio 962. F. Supp 1015 (S.D. Ohio 1997) Facts The defendant sent spam to the plaintiff’s subscribers. The plaintiff asked the defendant to stop sending spam; defendant responded by sending more spam to plaintiff. The plaintiff tried to modify its software to keep spam out; the defendant responded by changing their methodology (spoofing, etc). The plaintiff claims it has received threats from customers to discontinue their services because of the spam. Customers pay the plaintiff in time increments, so the spam costs them money. The plaintiff also claims the emails place significant burdens on its equipment. Plaintiff seeks a preliminary injunction. Procedural History The plaintiff, internet service provider, was granted a temporary restraining order that enjoined defendant advertising company from using the provider's services to send or receive electronic e-
Image of page 1

You've reached the end of your free preview.

Want to read the whole page?

  • Fall '07
  • Hoener
  • E-mail, Internet service provider, Injunction, advertising company, Preliminary injunction, temporary restraining order

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

  • Left Quote Icon

    Student Picture

Stuck? We have tutors online 24/7 who can help you get unstuck.
A+ icon
Ask Expert Tutors You can ask You can ask You can ask (will expire )
Answers in as fast as 15 minutes