Chapter 4 - Trait Approaches - 09-23-08 and 09-25-08

Chapter 4 - Trait Approaches - 09-23-08 and 09-25-08 -...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–4. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Michael deGroot Comm. As Social Science Chatper 4: Trait Approaches 1. Background Behavior Theroies (Not in the Text) 1. Real Science: Look at observable effects and causes, not anything within in our head. Overt Causes and Overt Response, Overt stimulus 2. When the social scientist wanted to study communication empirically, they adopted the scientific method and applied it to human behavior. 1. To study something scientifically, we must be able to quantify and measure both effect and causes 3. Call condition theories or learned theories 1. Classical foundational theories with causes and effects directly observable. 2. These theories came before all of the other cognitive theories. 4. Social scientist started using scientific methods through behaviorial theories. 1. Classical Conditioning 2. B.F Skinner 5. No hypothesis about anything happening within our head. 1. Why: Cognitive variables, in research studies, cannot be observed at the time, so how could this be scientific 2. Today, we test cognitive variables – they explain communication behavior in terms of what going on in our head – communication apprehension or ego- involvement 1. Why did we have this switch:
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
2. Characteristics 1. Deal only with observable causes and effects. 2. Do not assume that inner psychological variables cause a person’s behavior. 1. Don’t explain behavior in terms of what’s happening inside someone’s head but examine the external response and effect – real science. 3. Stimulus Response theories or S R 1. Stimulus is the cause and Response is the effect. 2. Ex. Pavlog theory. 1. Not concerned with increasing or decreasing response with reward or punishment, but rather how to associate an unconditioned response with a conditioned stimulus. 3. Developed by Pavlov 1. Famous scientist who one Nobile prize for science. 2. Starved dogs until they were very hungry. He showed them meat and they began salivating. 3. Exposure to Meat created the effect of Salvation 4. Then, several times showed dog meat and rang a bell 5. After, he simply just wrang the bell and the dog salivated 1. Goal: Get an animal to respond to totally new stimulus which had nothing to do with the old stimulus – meat.
Background image of page 2
Pavlov, there no internal variable. All stimulus and response directly observable 4. Purpose of classical condition is to get an animal or person to: 1. Answer: Respond to a new stimulus in the identical way it respond to an orginal similar. 3. Classical Conditioning Theory Pavlov 1. Terms 1. US = Unconditioned Stimulus . 2. UR = Unconditioned Response 3. CS = Conditioned Stimulus 4. CR = Conditioned Response. 2. Goal: 1. To teacher an animal /person to respond to a new stimulus in the same way it responds to the old stimulus. 1.
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 4
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 24

Chapter 4 - Trait Approaches - 09-23-08 and 09-25-08 -...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 4. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online