This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: C E E 5 9 7 R i s k A n a l y s i s a n d M a n a g e m e n t Homework Assignment #10 Homework Assignment for Friday, April 18, 2008. Computer exercise and reading: start early. Read articles in Bold, at least. Readings for Health Risk Analysis Paustenbach - history and background on health risk analysis packet Molak- Toxic Chemicals Noncancer Risk Analysis, 1997 packet Rodricks, Calculated Risks, the toxicity packet NRC 1983 - basic ideas and steps packet McClellan A Risk Assessment Primer, updates NRC 1993 packet Anderson et al. - basic ideas; dose-response analysis; scaling packet Crump, Methods for Carcinogenic Risk Assessment packet US EPA, What is Risk Assessment packet Lauerman, J.F., Combating Cancer packet Hattis and Kennedy - the goal, issues in analysis Readings p. 156 Calabrese, Hormesis: Changing view ... packet Rodricks and Taylor - recent background related to foods Readings p. 143 Ames et al.,- What are the risks? Readings p. 76 Epstein/Swartz's comment - not really? Readings p. 96 Abelson in Science - Health risk issues recaped. packet Colborn et al, Our Stolen Future - Beyond cancer packet Rhomberg, Are chemicals....Disrupting? packet Steingraber, Having Faith - wow! packet Regulatory Policy Readings Morrall, Review of the Record". Also discuss EPA Advisory Panel. Other references Wildsky in Readings in Risk; plus Graham & Carrothers; Kent & Allen; and Zeckhauser & Viscusi all in packet. Lots of issues. Dose-Response Modelling 1) Refering to Anderson et al., what are 3 compelling reasons that EPA (or other federal agencies) needs to employ quantitative health risk assessments?...
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 03/29/2009 for the course CEE 5950 taught by Professor Carr during the Fall '08 term at Cornell University (Engineering School).
- Fall '08