Microeconomic Theory
Econ 101A
Fall 2008
GSI: Eva Vivalt
Section Notes 2: Consumer Theory
1
Utility Maximization Problem
Problem setup:
•
Two goods:
x
1
and
x
2
with prices
p
1
and
p
2
.
•
Consumers have a ﬁxed income,
I
, and thus are constrained to spend less or equal to the amount
I
on goods
x
1
and
x
2
. Thus the budget constraint can be expressed as:
p
1
x
1
+
p
2
x
2
≤
I
.
•
It is impossible to consume negative amounts of goods, so
x
1
≥
0
,x
2
≥
0.
•
Consumers maximize utility
U
(
x
1
,x
2
) which is increasing in both
x
1
and
x
2
and quasiconcave in
(
x
1
,x
2
).
•
Consumers are price takers, which means that they take prices as ﬁxed (i.e. no impact of their
individual demands on prices. This can be justiﬁed by postulating a large number of consumers).
Since utility is increasing in both
x
1
and
x
2
, we can safely assume that the budget constraint holds with
equality. Also, we will assume that the nonnegativity constraints are slack, so that
x
1
>
0 and
x
2
>
0.
Setting the inequalities to equality, combining the two constraints, and rearranging a bit we get the
standard utility maximization problem (or UMP):
max
x
1
,x
2
U
(
x
1
,x
2
) s.t.
p
1
x
1
+
p
2
x
2
=
I
We can solve this constrained maximization problem by writing the Lagrangian:
L
(
x
1
,x
2
,λ
) =
U
(
x
1
,x
2
)

λ
[
p
1
x
1
+
p
2
x
2

I
]
and ﬁnding the FOCs:
∂L
∂x
1
=
U
1
(
x
*
1
,x
*
2
)

λ
*
x
1
= 0
∂L
∂x
2
=
U
2
(
x
*
1
,x
*
2
)

λ
*
x
2
= 0
∂L
∂λ
=

[
p
1
x
*
1
+
p
2
x
*
2

I
] = 0
The solution yields the Lagrange multiplier
λ
*
=
λ
*
(
p
1
,p
2
,I
) and the ordinary demand functions
x
*
1
=
x
*
1
(
p
1
,p
2
,I
) and
x
*
2
=
x
*
2
(
p
1
,p
2
,I
).
1
1
These are actually uncompensated demand functions. The functions are “uncompensated” because price changes will
cause utility changes – a situation which does not occur with compensated demand curves.
1
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document1.1
Example: Linear Expenditure System
The linear expenditure system (LES) is a generalization of the CobbDouglas utility function that incor
porates the idea that individuals require some minimum amount of each good (
a,b
). In this case, the
consumer’s UMP is:
max
x
1
,x
2
(
x
1

1)
α
(
x
2

b
)
β
s.t.
p
1
x
1
+
p
This is the end of the preview.
Sign up
to
access the rest of the document.
 Fall '08
 Staff
 Utility, p1, Utility maximization problem, Hicksian demand function, Expenditure minimization problem, FOCs

Click to edit the document details