Lecture November 13 - Lecture November 13: Social...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–4. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Lecture November 13: Social construction of social problems 2: social movements, experts and the media Claims o Standard form of persuasive claims and arguments Grounds Name Typifying example (horror story) o Reach their feelings by having them see actual situations o Example) Michael Moores movie o Keep in mind people are very suspicious Statistics o Must be as dramatic as example o Want a big number o How you present it must be dramatic Warrants Could appeal to values in terms of economics, behavior, fairness Conclusions Argue something has to be done about it Wide range of possible solutions o Some say government has to do something about it o Others say specific policies (details) Always some sort of action that needs to be taken Audiences o Diverse audiences Broad appeal: child abuse Controversial issues: split audiences (eg. Abortion Segmented audiences: race, gender, religion, class, residency Preach to the choir, useful at beginning Appeal to broadest possible audience. General arguments (vegetarianism) Surprising alliances. Uniforms and textbooks. o Dialogical process Claimsmaker take audiences ration into account Takes time to develop effective claims Prison Reform: Human rights, costs, higher tax bills Depending on your audience you can shift your positions slightly Usually takes time to develop an effective strategy The social problems arena o Competition for media and public attention Countless claimsmakers t rying to capture attention Events shape public agenda Pushes towards dramatic examples, catchy names and big numbers Even though the causes arent necessarily antagonistic, it just shows that there is a limited amount of resources and attention, you cant support all causes Media cant present all causes Competition for attention Steep incline to make your argument public Evolution and opposition o Claims keep evolving, not static o Once well established, a claim can turn stale and boring. Need to revise ad repackage claims (eg. Sexism, glass ceiling, double shift, occupational ghettos) Need to change way of speaking g about it to keep the topic alive/ still interesting o Domain expansion Battered child syndrome to child abuse o Piggy back Wife abusers, elder abuse, etc. Same with rights and rages Rhetorical stratgey Obesity framed. Boero (2007) All the news thats fat to print o Pre 1990 Moral reform. Crusade against gluttony and sexual excess. Return to simple diet of bland foods. Fought at home at the table by women. o 1900-1945 White middle and upper class women,. Value of natural thinness....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 04/04/2009 for the course DSOC 207 taught by Professor Santos during the Spring '08 term at Cornell University (Engineering School).

Page1 / 15

Lecture November 13 - Lecture November 13: Social...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 4. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online