This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Students must complete one of these forms for each team member and for themselves. The final typed hard-copy packet must be submitted to Carrie in 585 Kerr Hall by 5pm Friday, March 13. DHC 3rd Year Team Project Member Self and Peer Evaluation Name of member: Pooja Kumar Evaluator: Jeff Phang Team: Bike Date Submitted: INSTRUCTIONS A. Rank each area on a scale of 1 – 10 where 10 would be “consistently high positive contributions in this area” and 1 would be “no positive contributions in this area”. B. Provide justification for each score, using examples as appropriate. AREAS 1. Intellectual Contributions: Understanding the project, doing the research, evaluating and interpreting data, creative efforts and problem solving insight, providing intellectual leadership for group. Score: 10 Justification : My opinion of Pooja is consistently high. She extremely practical and doesn’t hesitate : My opinion of Pooja is consistently high....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 04/11/2009 for the course HNR 94 taught by Professor Groza during the Winter '07 term at UC Davis.
- Winter '07