Class notes 2 - Afghanistan, Iraq, and IR Theory Explaining...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Afghanistan, Iraq, and IR Theory Explaining 9/11 (a modest puzzle) a)attack b) tactics c)success Man: c) U.S. image c) strategic blunder-too much focus on china a) Clash ideology a) great man- bin laden State a) traditional vs. capitalist values a) Saudi-manifestation of internal domestic conflict a) State weakness- collapse of Afghanistan (after Russians leave) creates opportunity for terrorists to go there a) Bad states- Taliban in Afghanistan evil a) US was vulnerable-consumerism-weak?, 1993 trade center bombing led to criminal case- not much, 2000 USS COLE attacks not much done- political assessment of US responses – underestimated? c)---- Military Culture- under prepared for terrorists System a) U.S. unipolar- subject to attack b) U.S. stronger than anyone so attack must be done in less traditional way c) U.S. had too much focus on china a) Power vaccum
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
b) Explaining the Afghan War (not much of a puzzle) Man: no errors to account for, any man would have done it State: any type state probably would have done it
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 03/01/2008 for the course GOVT 1817 taught by Professor Katzenstein, p during the Fall '05 term at Cornell University (Engineering School).

Page1 / 3

Class notes 2 - Afghanistan, Iraq, and IR Theory Explaining...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online