Mike_102607

Mike_102607 - Phil 100 10/26 Filling out the study guide a...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Phil 100 10/26 Filling out the study guide a bit: Question 1. Defne or explain the ollowing terms, and identiy the source or d, e, and i. a. Deontological ethical theories. Theories which defne ethical obligation in terms o duty as opposed to achievement o desirable consequences or qualities o character. Consequences and good character are said to be irrelevant to the determination o ethical or moral obligation. b. Divine command theory. There are two versions. The absolute version : What is morally right is right because God commands it. The moderate version : What God commands is right, not simply because he commands it, but because it is right. c. First formulation of Kants categorical imperative: Act only on that maxim through which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law. (Or: Never act except in such a way that you can also will that your maxim should become a universal law.) (Maxim: rule o conduct. Can means can without logical inconsistency.) d. The distinction between the way and the attainment . The way: the means o attaining a state o consciousness wherein it is impossible to take lie seriously. The way requires hard work, dedication, and taking ones sel seriously. The attainment: The actual achievement o a state o consciousness wherein it is impossible to take lie seriously. Being in such a state, o course, does not require you to take lie seriously. (Source: Odells handout, Ethics and the Meaning o Lie, p. 5-6.) e. Ineffability and noetic quality as necessary conditions of a mystical experience. In order or an experience to count as a mystical experience, it is necessary that it have the ollowing eatures. (1) Ineability: The experience cannot be described in words; in order to understand what its like to undergo the experience and the worth o having it, you must undergo the experience yoursel. (2) Noetic quality: The experience must seem, to the person who has it, to be one in which knowledge about, or insight into, the nature o reality is obtained. (Source: Odells handout, Ethics and the Meaning o Lie, p. 7.) . Descriptive ethics. The description o the moral practices or morality o some individual or group. As a discipline it is part o the social sciences. g. Odells version of Kants 1st formulation of the categorical imperative: Never do anything the universal doing o which makes it impossible or you to do it. h. Anthropormorphism . The attribution o human characteristics to non-humansGods, nature, or animals. Typographic error for i : its either: i (i). Essence precedes existence....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 04/29/2008 for the course PHIL 100 taught by Professor ? during the Spring '07 term at Maryland.

Page1 / 5

Mike_102607 - Phil 100 10/26 Filling out the study guide a...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online