Odell_Ethics_Meaning_of_life

Odell_Ethics_Meaning_of_life - Handout Philosophy 100:...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
1 Handout Philosophy 100: Ethics and the Meaning of Life: Russell, Sartre, Camus and Nagel— Professor Odell Ethics and The Philosophy of Life Ethics can be understood as either a technique for attaining a good or meaningful life, or as an analytic discipline within philosophy that attempts to critically formulate and evaluate ethical codes. The teachings and works of men like Christ, the Buddha, Confucius, and other mystics and holy men, and philosophers like Plato, Epicurus, Spinoza, and Nietzsche, as well as novelists like the Great Russian writers Tolstoy and Dostoevsky, are all concerned with discovering how to live a proper life. These men were not concerned with questions like: "How is it possible, if possible at all, to justify an ethical code?" "What are the advantages of rule over act utilitarianism?" "How do we actually use terms like 'good', 'right', 'duty', 'wrong', etc.?" These questions are, however, commonly addressed by, and define much of the work of, the professional ethicist. It is easy to be confused about the difference between ethics on the one hand and the philosophy of life on the other. Epicurus is an egoistic consequentialist; the good life for him is one that results in contentment—the avoidance of pain. His philosophy is primarily a philosophy of life. He offers us a way of living that he considers to be optimal. So do founders of religion. Jesus, the Buddha, Mohammed, and Zoroaster are all concerned with how we ought to live our lives. i They all promise happiness or contentment for those who follow their advise. So do a variety of holy men and saints. The antithesis of all such programs is nihilism—the view that nothing we do matters one way or another. It is the view that there are no objective values. Or, to put the matter differently, it is the view that life is pointless, aimless, purposeless, or hopeless. In the ancient world, this view was expressed by the prophet or sage responsible for Ecclesiastics, and in the Middle Ages by the great Persian poet Omar Khayyam. In the twentieth century it has been expressed by the existentialists Sartre and Camus, and by the contemporary American philosopher Thomas Nagel, all of whom prefer to put the matter in terms of the absurdity of life. They claim that from the objective point of view, life is absurd. They do allow, however, that life can be subjectively or personally significant or meaningful. Nagel has a unique perspective on the meaning of life question. ii For him, life can be demonstrated to be absurd, and although it is only reflective individuals who are aware of its absurdity, this fact, though ironic, is mankind’s most interesting characteristic. Ethics is related to the philosophy of life issue in an essential and important respect. Ethics provides one with a justified program for social success, and does thereby provide a pathway to a happy, or at the very least, a non-painful existence. It greatly increases the possibility for one’s life to be a happy one. If I
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 10

Odell_Ethics_Meaning_of_life - Handout Philosophy 100:...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online