97%(178)172 out of 178 people found this document helpful
This preview shows page 1 - 2 out of 2 pages.
Page 3.2 Practice: Arguments Are SupportJohn McCardell of Middlebury College presents the following premises in his argument: (1) theminimum-21 drinking law has created a culture of dangerous and unsupervised binge-drinking;(2) the minimum-21 drinking law is impossible to enforce; and (3) 18-year-olds in this countryare trusted to vote, perform jury duty, and serve in the military. Which of the followingrepresents the conclusion he reaches?The drinking age should be lowered to 18.To what extent do you agree with the logic that when laws are too difficult or expensive toenforce, we should dispense with them? Provide at least one example or counter-example todemonstrate why you feel that way. (Opinion question no wrong)Laws can be effective, even though it can be expensive to uphold, tailoring the law is oneway of adjusting over a period time, as well as for the cost effectiveness.I would agree to some extent and I cite the war on drugs as an example of what Ipersonally believe to be a costly, inefficient, and difficult to enforce set of laws. I believe
You've reached the end of your free preview.
Want to read both pages?
Law,Drinking culture,younger age,Alcohol law,Legal drinking age