Econ 367 PS6 - PS 6 Solutions Econ 367 Kaushik Basu 1. Let...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
PS 6 Solutions Econ 367 Kaushik Basu 1. Let us consider Firm 1. Since they are symmetric firms, the analysis will be the same for firm 2. P=100-Q Q= q 1 + q 2 Profit firm 1 = P*q 1 Firm 1 maximizes (100-( q 1 + q 2 )) q 1 =100q 1 -q 1 2 -q 1 q 2 Differentiate w/ respect to q1 and set equal to zero to maximize 100-2q1-q2=0 q 1 =50-q 2 /2 By symmetry q 2 =50-q 1 /2 Solving the system of these two best response functions, the NE is (100/3,100/3) The firms could make more money by producing the monopoly amount and sharing profits. We know that monopoly profits is greater than the Cournot firm’s profits because the monopolist could have picked q 1 *+q 2 * but did not. In an unlimited capacity state, firm 2 produces more than 20. When limited to 20, firm 1 will plug this amount into its best response function and produce 40. NE (40,20) 2. In a symmetric Bertrand game, the firms always cut their prices down to cost in an attempt to gain more profit. Here cost=0. For any price firm 1 chooses above zero, the other firm will price one cent below and gain the entire market. Then Firm 1 will undercut this new price in order to gain a profit greater than 0. This
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 2

Econ 367 PS6 - PS 6 Solutions Econ 367 Kaushik Basu 1. Let...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online