PHILOSOPHY SUCKS

PHILOSOPHY SUCKS - Unit 3, 4 Outline 1. Laws of Nature (A)...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Unit 3, 4 Outline 1. Laws of Nature (A) Regularity Theories (i) Humes original-Its a law that all As are Bs -EX: If an A then B is always true (ii) Humes with first existential modification-All As are Bs is always true and there is an A (ii) Humes with counterfactual modification-If A then B is always true and if something were an A, then it would be a B (B) Problems (i) Vacuous Laws-need to add initial claim that there is an A. -objection to simple regulatory theory (if A then always B), says that true with out Amermaids are always bluebut there are no mermaids need to add initial idea that there are mermaid. (ii) Non-instantial Laws-there are no such particles-all particles with no force remain at rest or acting in a straight line...there arent any particles because there is always a force like gravity. (iii) Probabilistic Laws-Not in the form of all As are Bs-EX: half life is 1620 years, so it will prob. Decay in 1620 is 1/2 (iv) Accidental Generalizations-Moral: laws must tell us what would happen if things were different- not only what actually happens.-All dogs born at sear are not cockerspanialsGeneralizations dont have to support conterfuctuals about how things could have been but laws must. (v) Circularity Worry-Gold sphere and oranion sphere. It is metaphysically possible that both are a mile in diameter, but it is physically impossible that the uranium is. What does it mean to be physically possible? To appeal to a law of nature. But we need to know the possibilities of physical form to know a natural lawCircular!-These arguments are circular because we need a physically possible object.-Generalizations about actual things cant happen. Laws tell us what would happen if things were different. (vi) Order of Explanation Worry-Cant work because it gets the order backwards because we cant appeal to counterfactuals to explain laws. (C) Know which of Humes views (modified or not) each problem is a problem for, and exactly why....
View Full Document

Page1 / 6

PHILOSOPHY SUCKS - Unit 3, 4 Outline 1. Laws of Nature (A)...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online