myriad of notable items

Myriad of notable - No real schools of IR theory prior to WWII o Levels of Analysis o o Endogenous-domestic/individual level o o

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: No real schools of IR theory prior to WWII o Levels of Analysis: o o Endogenous-domestic/individual level o o Exogenous-international/system level o o Values: culture-specific or universal? o o Structure/Agency o o Mental Maps and Sources of Knowledge o o Multiplication of actors/networks/inputs o o Speed of communications o o Complex interdependence eventually leads to… o o o …Globalization: the positive and the negative o o Reduction of state sovereignty and of risk of war o o Increase in resentment, enmity, desire for “revenge” o Strengths of Liberalism Belief in activist institutional organisation Universal, international, holistic perspective Refusal to accept “laws of the jungle” o Weaknesses of Liberalism No prescription for armed force Divisions bet interventionists and non-interv.s Self-righteous moralising normative feature 1. Realism and Power Politics • Failure of liberalism (“ appeasement” ) to constrain fascism • The most influential school of IR theory • Draws on theories from Thucydides, Machiavelli, Hobbes o Natural state of the world = anarchic & dangerous o States , (national interest/survival) = primary actors o Aim: maximise relative gain via power o Self-help and sovereignty = key notions 1 o Pessimistic about order via international institutions • Prevention of war & stability via balance of power • Change via shifting strategic alliances reflecting b. of p. • Philosophy, ethics and morality: little or no place in IR o Strengths of Realism Explanation of sources of conflict Appropriate to post WWII + the nuclear age Rejection normative “wishful-thinking” o Weaknesses of realism Cannot account for inter-state co-operation Ignores role of other actors in intnat. system No attempt to improve situation of the world No clear prescriptions for action 2. Battle between Neo-liberalism and Neo-Realism (70s/80s) • Keohane & Nye (1972) pose challenge to realism: o Interdependence, transnationalism , non-state actors o Accuse realists of minimising cooperation o Complex interdependence (K & N 1977) determines relat.s between states o Economic dynamics behind IR • Realist theories refined by Neo-realism (Waltz, 1979) o Sometimes called structural realism o Rejects state-level theory in favour of global level o Systemic constraints dictate state behavior o Anarchy reigns & states differ only in capacity o States seek to maintain hierarchical position 3. The 1990s Constructivist Critique of Rationalism (Wendt, Katzenstein, Onuf, Risse) • Failure of IR theory to foresee/explain End of Cold War • 1989 opened up new space for alternative approaches • New generation IR scholars dissatisfied w. critical theory • Basic tenets of constructivism: o Normative/ideational structures are crucial o Shared ideas/beliefs/values influence soc./pol. action o Norms/ideas shape social identity of political actors o Identities inform interests and actions o Realists ignore how actors’ develop interests 2...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 05/02/2008 for the course PLSC 113 taught by Professor Danielbutler during the Spring '08 term at Yale.

Page1 / 22

Myriad of notable - No real schools of IR theory prior to WWII o Levels of Analysis o o Endogenous-domestic/individual level o o

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online