Terry - Contracts Outline

Terry - Contracts Outline - Types of Contracts Types of Ks...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Types of Contracts Types of Ks as to Formation 1. Express – formed by language , oral or written 2. Implied – formed by manifestations of assent, usually in the form of conduct other than oral or written 3. Quasi-Contract – not actually Ks; constructed by courts to avoid unjust enrichment through remedy of restitution. Types of Ks as to Acceptance Classical 1. Bilateral – promise for promise only; exchange of mutual promise 2. Unilateral – promise for performance; acceptance by performance revocable by offeror at any time prior to completion of performance Modern – most Ks are bilateral 1. Bilateral – acceptance by Promise or Start of Performance (R2d 32) 2. Unilateral – limited to two circumstances a. where offeror indicates acceptance only by completion of performance b. offers to the public (i.e., rewards) Test: Bilateral vs. Unilateral 1. Bilateral – each party has a right and a duty 2. Unilateral – one party only has a right and the other has only a duty Types of Ks as to Validity 1. Void – without any legal effect from the beginning (K for illegal acts) 2. Voidable – one or both parties may elect to avoid (K of minors) 3. Unenforceable – valid, but not enforceable due to various defenses (like statute of limitations or frauds) Step 1: What Law Applies? Common Law or UCC COMMON LAW: governs everything but those covered by UCC. Common applies to everything, including goods, unless the UCC conflicts, then UCC prevails regarding goods. UCC: governs the exchange of goods (movable objects) between merchants (someone who deals in goods or by his occupation holds himself out as having knowledge or skills peculiar to goods involved). If conflict between UCC and common law, then UCC prevails! Step 2: Was a contract validly formed? ELEMENTS 1. Mutual Assent (offer and acceptance)? 2. Consideration, or some substitute? 3. Defenses to formation? 1
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
MUTUAL ASSENT – OFFER AND ACCEPTANCE I) Generally: “a meeting of the minds.” No actual meeting is required; but an objective measure of intent to be bound. An OFFER and ACCEPTANCE are forms of assent. Offer and acceptance + intent to be bound Can be express or implied-in-fact (not expressed by is bargained for exchange) exmp ordering food off menu – never say “I will pay you” but implied by circumstances A) Objective Measure of Intent 1) External manifestations of intent to be bound (a) Reasonable person std – what would reas person in same position believe (b) Not necessarily expressed: can be by gesture, silence (c) Easier to determine than pure will theory (d) May make ppl conform to more reas behavior B) R2d 20 1) A & B have same meaning K w/ that meaning (subjective) 2) (a) Neither party knows or has reason to know other’s meaning no k (b) Each party knows or has reason to know other’s meaning no k (c) A doesn’t know or have reason to know B’s meaning, but B does know or have reason to know A’s meaning
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 03/03/2008 for the course LAW 503 taught by Professor Gross during the Fall '05 term at USC.

Page1 / 35

Terry - Contracts Outline - Types of Contracts Types of Ks...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online