{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

Torts II - I Joint Tortfeasors a Whenever you have multiple...

Info icon This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
I. Joint Tortfeasors a. Whenever you have multiple tortfeasors, consider whether they will be jointly and severally liable. i. General Rule: If more than one person is an actual and proximate cause of P’s harm, and the harm is indivisible, each D is liable for the entire harm. ii. Often Tested Issue: “Was the harm to P indivisible?” If not, there is no joint and several liability. 1. Ex: D1 and D2 shoot at P. D1 hits P in the leg, D2 hits him in the eye. If we can apportion the harm, including pain and suffering – which we can do here – then there’s no joint and several liability; each D pays only for the harm he himself caused. iii. If joint and several liability applies, then P can collect the entire amount from whichever single D he wishes. Alternatively, he may collect some from each, with the limitation of one total satisfaction. iv. Two common contexts for joint and several liability: 1. Employer/employee- each is jointly and severally liable (the employer on a “vicarious liability” theory.) 2. Where a dangerous product injures the consumer, both the manufacturer and the retailer will be jointly and severally liable if P recovers in strict product liability. v. Very often tested: The interaction between traditional joint and several liability and comparative negligence. 1. If there is no statute dealing specifically with this interaction, then joint and several liability persists as to that portion of the total fault that is not the P’s. a. Ex: P has total, indivisible, injuries of $100,000. The jury finds that P was 30% at fault, D1 was 50% at fault and D2 20%. The jurisdiction has a comparative negligence statute, but no statute addressing joint and several liability. P can only collect $70,000, which he can collect all from D1, all from D2, or a mix. 2. Some states now have special statutes limiting joint and several liability in connection with comparative negligence. If your facts are silent about whether such a statute is in force, you might want to give the traditional analysis as in the prior paragraph, and then speculate. a. Ex: But the state may have a statute, as a number of states do now, abolishing joint and several liability for any D found to be less than 50% at fault for the accident. b. Whenever you have multiple tortfeasors, consider whether one has the right to contribution from the other(s). Contribution is a cost-sharing in favor of one who has paid more than his proportionate share of the total liability. i. Under classic common law contribution, the court makes each D pay an equal net amount. 1. Ex: D1 and D2 are found jointly and severally liable for P’s $100,000 injuries. P collects $70,000 from D1 and $30,000 from
Image of page 1

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
D2. Under the common law approach, D1 can get contribution of $20,000 from D2, since this is the amount needed to equalize their shares.
Image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

What students are saying

  • Left Quote Icon

    As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

    Student Picture

    Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

    Student Picture

    Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

    Student Picture

    Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern