{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

Review_Questions_for_the_Final_v.1.1

Review_Questions_for_the_Final_v.1.1 - Review Questions for...

This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

Review Questions for the AST309 Final Formulas: Flux (i.e., brightness) is equal to (Luminosity / 4 d 2 ) where d is distance from you. You measure the flux, luminosity is a standard candle, so you can solve for the distance to determine how far away an object is. Hubble’s Law : The more distant a galaxy is, the faster it is moving away from us. The formula is V = H 0 D where V is velocity in km/sec, H 0 is Hubble’s Constant (approxi- mately 71), and D is the distance in Mpc. 1. What are the two main reasons why gamma-ray bursts are so hard to study? Because GRBs are so short in duration, it was necessary to build faster-responding tele- scopes in order to determine their redshifts, and thus their distances. This has now been somewhat accomplished, and improvements are being made all the time. We now believe that they are not isotropic (although they are isotropic in distribution , they are not isotropic in their outputs ), this means that we must be in a special orientation in order to see them. This in turn means that (a) we cannot be certain what their actual flux is, and (b) that we are only seeing about 1% of the GRBs that happen. Another problem is that because their energy output is so high, what we perceive of them is subject to Relativistic Beaming, or Doppler Boosting. Since the jet is coming almost straight towards our eyes and since it is traveling at relativistic speeds, the flux that we detect is exaggerated relative to what it actually is. This is a result of Einstein's theory of special relativity, since when objects travel very fast, they appear to increase their mass and therefore their energy. The relativistic effects cause GRBs to be perceived as about a factor of 100 more energetic than they really are. This also complicates the difficulty in determining their intrinsic brightness. 2. Why do we think that gamma-ray bursts are associated with star formation? Now that we have redshift information about many sources, we can look at their distribu- tion in time (we already know that they are spatially isotropic). It appears that GRBs hap- pened more often in the past. The other things that we know are more prevalent in the past are quasars and newly-formed galaxies. These imply that star-formation was more common, which possibly suggests that there might be a connection between star- formation and these processes. However, we need more direct evidence rather than a temporal connection. We do this by looking at what type of galaxies these GRBs occur in and where in the galaxy they lie. It turns out that there are two additional bits that suggest GRBs are associated with star formation. The galaxy type is generally in young, active galaxies, such as disk galaxies that contain lots of gas and dust. The other bit of evidence is that the GRBs are NOT preferentially located in the galaxy centers, but are instead dis- tributed throughout the galaxy with a disk-like distribution. This strongly suggests two things: that GRBs are probably not associated with supermassive black holes, and that

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Page1 / 7

Review_Questions_for_the_Final_v.1.1 - Review Questions for...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online