07-11-26, Cases - Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857): Facts:...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857): Facts : Scott is born a slave in Missouri (slave state), but owner travels to Illinois (a free state), then back to Missouri. Scott argues that he was free by virtue of traveling through Illinois. Question : Holding : The case is thrown out for lack of federal jurisdiction b/c Scott was a slave, not a citizen. The forum state’s law’s could be followed. Rationale : People of African ancestry, whether born into slavery or born to free parents, are NEVER free citizens in the eyes of the Constitution. Significance : Strauder v. West Virginia 100 U.S. 303  ( 1880 ) Facts : At the time, West Virginia excluded African-Americans from juries. Strauder was an African-American man who, at trial, had been convicted of murder—convicted, by an all-white jury. Strauder appealed his conviction, contending that West Virginia's exclusionary policy violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Question : violation of the equal protection clause? Holding : Yes. Rationale : The majority, speaking through Justice William Strong, held that exclusion of blacks from juries for no other reason than their race did indeed violate the Equal Protection Clause, since the very purpose of the Clause was "to assure to the colored race the enjoyment of all the civil rights that under the law are enjoyed by white persons, and to give to that race the protection of the general government, in that enjoyment, whenever it should be denied by the States." The Court did not say that exclusion of blacks from the jury violated the rights of potential jury members; rather, such exclusion violated the rights of a black criminal defendant, since juries would be "drawn from a panel from which the State has expressly excluded every man of [a defendant's] race." Significance : Plessy v. Ferguson 163 U.S. 537  (1896) Facts : Post Reconstruction Jim Crow laws. In 1890, the State of Louisiana passed Act 111 that required separate accommodations for blacks and whites on railroads, including separate railway cars, though it specified that the accommodations must be kept "equal". Concerned, several black and white citizens in New Orleans formed an association, the Citizen's Committee to Test the Separate Car Act, dedicated to the repeal of that law. They raised $1412.70 which they offered to
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 3

07-11-26, Cases - Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857): Facts:...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online