Examples 8.1

# Examples 8.1 - Notes 8.1 Symbols and Translation So up to...

This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

Notes 8.1 Symbols and Translation So, up to now, we’ve studied Categorical Logic and Symbolic Logic. But that leaves one more type of logic to go. Predicate Logic is just like the others, ultimately, in that it provides us with a method for analyzing the validity of arguments. Remember, this is really the point of the whole course: to understand why good arguments are good and why bad arguments are bad. Predicate Logic is important because it’s even more powerful than the Categorical and Symbolic Logic for analyzing arguments. Consider the following categorical syllogism (taken from the book, I swear!): All student hookups are quickie sexual encounters. No quickie sexual encounters are committed relationships. Therefore, no student hookups are committed relationships. What’s important here, of course, is the term (remember the major, minor, and middle terms??). The arrangement of the terms is what eventually becomes the important thing for categorical logic (remember the forms of categorical syllogisms—AAA-2, etc.—and how we knew whether an argument was valid simply by appealing to those?). Next was Symbolic Logic—here’s an argument you could symbolize: If chronic stress is reduced, then relaxation increases and health improves. If health improves, then people live longer. Therefore, if chronic stress is reduced, then people live longer. Here what’s important is not the term, but the whole statement (proposition). That is, the statement is taken as the most fundamental unit (rather than the term). From there, the arrangement of the propositions will tell you all you need to know about validity—thus the reduction to symbols, the connectives, and the truth tables. But consider the following argument (again, taken from the book—I don’t have anything for Julia Roberts, I swear): Julia Roberts is rich and beautiful. If a woman is either rich or famous, she is happy. Therefore, Julia Roberts is happy. Categorical Logic isn’t going to help us much here in determining validity. I don’t know how you would translate the two premises into a categorical proposition—remember, categorical propositions are comparing two classes, but the premises are talking about lots of classes of things (Julia Roberts, rich things, beautiful things, famous things, happy

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

### Page1 / 5

Examples 8.1 - Notes 8.1 Symbols and Translation So up to...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online