Problem Set 7 Solutions

Problem Set 7 Solutions - Economics 3213 Answers to Problem...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Economics 3213 Answers to Problem Set 7: Pocahontas Prof. Xavier Sala-i-Martin 1. Ratcliffe A. The costs of transacting between money and financial assets are any direct and indirect costs that consumers incur when transferring their interest-bearing financial assets, such as bank accounts, bonds, etc., into money, which they need for purchases. Direct costs include bank fees, broker fees, transportation costs to get to the bank, etc. Indirect costs include time spent to go to the bank or to make transactions, which represents forgone wages or forgone leisure. B. The introduction of ATMs makes it easier to convert interest-bearing assets, such as saving accounts, into money. Transaction costs are reduced, so consumers can afford to make more frequent transactions and keep less money in their pockets. Aggregate money demand is reduced. C. The model of money demand discussed in class assumes that people need money for purchases but would like to keep their wealth in interest-bearing assets. Consumers incur a cost each time they convert assets into money. Optimal money demand is found as a "compromise" between the desire keep as little money as possible and earn interest and the opposing desire to make as few transactions as possible and save on transaction costs. The introduction of ATMs lowers the transaction cost, so that consumers can afford to make more frequent transactions, keep less money at any point in time, and earn more interest. Aggregate money demand decreases. 2. Grandmother Willow A. The Walras Law does not say that the output market is in equilibrium all the time. If consumers are not optimizing, i.e. they are not exhausting their budget constraint, their demand for consumption may be less than the supply of output. Real consumption will be less than real output, and the goods market equilibrium condition C t = Y t will not hold. The problem here is that the budget constraint does not hold with equality. B. Neither does the Walras Law say that all markets are in equilibrium all the time. Take the three markets that we saw in class: output, money, and bonds. Suppose that the output market is in equilibrium but that the excess supply of money (money supply minus money
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
demand) is exactly equal to the excess demand for bonds. The budget constraint is satisfied, but both money and bonds markets are clearly in disequilibrium. Money supply is not equal to money demand, and bonds are not equal to zero. The problem here is that only one market out of the three is in equilibrium, and, therefore, nothing can be concluded about the other two. C. The Walras Law states that if the aggregate budget constraint is satisfied and if all markets are known to be in equilibrium, except for one, then the last market must be in equilibrium as well. D. The household's budget constraint in any period
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This homework help was uploaded on 04/07/2008 for the course ECON W3213 taught by Professor Xavier during the Fall '06 term at Columbia.

Page1 / 7

Problem Set 7 Solutions - Economics 3213 Answers to Problem...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online