Ch. 8 - Ch 8 Notes The first issue product safety is big o...

Info icon This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ch. 8 Notes The first issue, product safety , is big o Are corporations responsible for their products, especially when they are freely chosen and purchased by consumers? o Should we have government agencies to regulate potentially dangerous products, or should we allow market forces to determine how such goods are exchanged? o McDonald’s case: Should they be held responsible for the negative effects of their products? Or should responsibility rest with consumers? The lawsuit against McDonalds (and tobacco companies, gun manufacturers, auto companies, etc.) are instances of product liability lawsuits o Product liability lawsuits are government interventions in the market and hence they are the source of massive debate by economists and social theorists Your editors provide you with a nice history of the development of product liability law and the spectrum of positions o Buyer beware (corporations, businesses, sellers, have no responsibility) o Negligence liability (corporations et al. have to be consciously and grossly negligent in selling dangerous products to be responsible) o Strict liability (corporations can be held legally liable for the consequences of their products even when they are not knowingly negligent) The latter system is the one we currently have in the US (your editors propose a modification of it that spreads costs around a bit, but they remain committed to strict liability) Free market, CSR (Friedman) theorists are adamantly opposed to product liability law o They argue, first, that the market will self-correct for product safety— again, harming one’s consumers makes bad market sense (not a strong argument as we saw earlier—short-term vs. long-term) o Second, it undercuts the value of individual responsibility and teaches people to shift the blame o Third, it leads to fishing expeditions and frivolous lawsuits (which is how many people see that McDonald’s coffee case) o The main argument, though, is that strict liability imposes excessive costs on business and corporations o The argument is elegant and simple: High tort (private party lawsuits) penalties are equivalent to increased taxes Increased taxes lead to the production of economic losses in the form of less services and products provided by corporations Less services and products leads to higher prices for consumers , lower wages for workers , and lower stock prices/profits for investors
Image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Notice, there is no CEO compensation discussion…
Image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

What students are saying

  • Left Quote Icon

    As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

    Student Picture

    Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

    Student Picture

    Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

    Student Picture

    Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern