{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

MAE 362 Solution HW5

# MAE 362 Solution HW5 - MAE 362 Solution HW 5 1[25pts Recall...

This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: MAE 362 Solution HW # 5 1. [25pts] Recall that we developed normal shock relations for the limiting case of 1 M P (sec 3.6). Do the same for the oblique shock relations and determine relations for 2 1 P P , 2 1 T T , θ , 2 M . (For completeness I’ll provide 2 1 ρ ρ ) Our normal shock relation for pressure is, ( 29 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 sin 1 1 P M P γ β γ = +- + . If we take the limit this becomes, 2 2 2 1 1 2 sin 1 P M P γ β γ = + . Our normal shock relation for density is, ( 29 ( 29 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 sin 1 sin 2 M M γ β ρ ρ γ β + =- + . If we take the limit this becomes, 2 1 1 1 ρ γ ρ γ + =- . Finally, our normal shock relation for temperature is seen below. ( 29 ( 29 ( 29 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 sin 2 2 1 sin 1 1 1 sin M T P M T P M γ β ρ γ β ρ γ γ β- + = = +- + + If we take the limit we can state that, ( 29 ( 29 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 sin sin 1 1 1 T M M T γ γ γ γ β β γ γ γ-- = = + + + To analyze our angle of inclination and beta relationship, we can make certain statements that allow us to go a step further for a more simplified yet still accurate solution. The general methodology is as follows, ( 29 2 2 1 2 1 sin 1 tan 2cot cos2 2 M M β θ β γ β- = + + => ( 29 ( 29 cos sin sin 2 tan 2 cos2 cos2 β β β θ γ β γ β = = + + However, if we make the statement that the angle of inclination is small, and as a result...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

### Page1 / 4

MAE 362 Solution HW5 - MAE 362 Solution HW 5 1[25pts Recall...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online