{[ promptMessage ]}

Bookmark it

{[ promptMessage ]}

ARC 455 - Study Questions - Johnson Chs 6-7

ARC 455 - Study Questions - Johnson Chs 6-7 - Johnson...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Johnson Chapters 6-7 Cognitive and Post-Processual Archaeology Johnson, Chapter 6 1. Why does Johnson argue that getting at past thoughts and beliefs is necessary ? 1. We all make assumptions about the past whether we like it or not. We cannot assume things are “normal” or “natural” in human beings and we cannot be endocentric. 2. If we are going to relate archaeological evidence to documentary evidence, then some attention must be paid to the mental attitudes and ideas that played their part in producing that evidence. 3. It is almost impossible to describe human behavior without referring to mental concepts. We understand actions by reference to their context. 2. Johnson discusses three kinds of cognitive archaeology: Cognitive-Processual, Structuralism, and Marxism. How does he define each? 1. Cognitive-Processual – a way of looking at cognition within the general assumptions and framework of processualism 2. Structuralism – culture is like language; implicit (hidden), not explicit (surface); 3. Marxism – a materialist philosophy (proposes material things are more
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.
  • Spring '08
  • MCANDREWS
  • Archaeology, Material Culture, Post-Processual Archaeology Johnson, different archaeological interpretations, various Interpretive Archaeologies., Post-Processualists/Interpretive archaeologists risk

{[ snackBarMessage ]}