ARC 455 - Study Questions - Flannery and Clarke

ARC 455 - Study Questions - Flannery and Clarke - Marisa...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Marisa Meisner Spring 2008 Study Questions Flannery 1967 Culture History v. Cultural Process: A Debate in American Archaeology Clarke 1973 Archaeology: The Loss of Evidence 1. How does Flannery compare American archaeology and ethnology? Flannery shows how archaeology and ethnology have grown together, supporting each other, as well as in their own disciplines 2. What is the purpose of Flannery's discussion of Gordon Willey's book? Flannery prefers books written by several authors incase one does not have writing style suitable for one reader. He attacks Willey’s inability to commit to any particular theory and says that archaeologists need to be firm in their beliefs. 3. Describe the theoretical framework of the cultural historians. It is described as “normative”. They treat culture as a body of shared ideas, values and beliefs (aka the “norms” or a human group). Members of a given culture are committed to these norms in different degrees. 4. According to Flannery, how does the Processual School differ from the Culture History School? Processual: to isolate each system and study it as a separate variable. The ultimate
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 05/04/2008 for the course ARC 455 taught by Professor Mcandrews during the Spring '08 term at Wisc La Crosse.

Page1 / 2

ARC 455 - Study Questions - Flannery and Clarke - Marisa...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online