tort class notes 3,15

tort class notes 3,15 - By dangerouse animals need to be...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
By dangerouse animals need to be dangerouse and unusuall in the place where they are. Bull, dangerouse- but if in texaswhere nrmall to be not strictly liable. Dog or cat, if I know or reasonably know that it is a dangerouse dog,, now I can be held strictly liabel because it is now dangerouse and unusuall. Rylands v. fletcher (p798) Facts: man fills water on his property. The plaintiff is a minor. The defendants water came and filled his mine with water. Why wouldn’t a normall cause of action work here like trespass to land. Prob is intent – no intention to send his water onto p’s land. What about nuisance? One thing almost always true is the prob continues, this is a one time event. One reason why nuisance is continuaous is because th eocntinuing factor makes it intential. Why not sue for negligence or bad wall building? D hired resivore designer – an independent contracter, so is person who hires independent contractor liabel for his torts? No s no negligence for the owner in the way the resivor
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 2

tort class notes 3,15 - By dangerouse animals need to be...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online