Constitutional Law II Highlights, Rules, and Theories

Constitutional Law II Highlights, Rules, and Theories -...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Constitutional Law II Highlights, rules and theories Equal protection Purpose of eq. protection is to "root out archaic and overbroad stereotypes."  Treat likes alike. "Our Constitution is color-blind."  - J. Harlan, dissent, in  Plessey . "There are no castes here." - J. Harlan, dissent, in  Plessey Is there  state action ? o What’s the  classification  done by the legislation? [FAMI] economic legislation (business regulations)?  Mere rationality  - one-step-at-a-time  ( Railway Express Agency Lee Optical ) Is the legis.  facially neutral  with regards to suspect classes? [ F] Was there discriminatory  motive  or  intent?  [ MI ] Must have discriminatory  intent to reach strict scrutiny in legislation that's otherwise neutral.  o Otherwise intermed. scrutiny UNLESS RAN classification. Is there discrimination in administration?  [A]  Yick, [strict scr.] o What's  standard of review/scrutiny ? o Does the classification serve the  purpose  of legislation? Do the means fit the ends? [Tailoring?] STATE ACTION - POLICIES BEING SERVED BY STATE ACTION REQUIREMENT •  Individual Autonomy  - Privacy  •  Federalism  - Preservation between states and federal Govt. •  Separation of Powers  - give Congress due.   -  Parks, elections, utility (no?), company town…  fire, police, tax collection if delegated? TWO BASIC categories of indicia of state action 1. Public function      - Is private actor sufficiently like the state to be "state action"  a. Activity must be a " traditionally " and " exclusively " reserved state function. ( Jackson)  i.  Running a company  town  ( Marsh ), a municipal  park  ( Newton ), or an  election  ( White Primary Cases ). 1. but  not  running a shopping center ( Hudgens ), a regulated utility  ( Jackson ), or resolving private disputes ( Flagg Brothers .).  2. Nexus/ Significant state involvement      – use of courts (Shelly v. Kraemer), yes a. No state action if private landowner throws out and police enforce. b. Joint participation/state symbiosis qualifies as state action – ( Burton ) Very fact specific.   c. Licensing – Alone is NOT state action. ( Moose Lodge ) "Significant" State Involvement" -- Summary The Court has found state action to  exist  in cases of: [ JES ]  Joint participation  with the State ( Lugar/Edmonson )  State encouragement , ratification, or enforcement of discriminatory private action that would be  //home/vdimitrov/9236/387afaf5c5afe1b71a52695fc0fac57ae5245e14.doc 1
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Constitutional Law II Highlights, rules and theories unconstitutional if undertaken by state officials (
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 02/15/2008 for the course LAW 1050 taught by Professor Shea during the Spring '04 term at St. Johns Duplicate.

Page1 / 21

Constitutional Law II Highlights, Rules, and Theories -...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online