Philosophy 140

Philosophy 140 - not guilty conscripts combatant ---...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Phil 140 07/10/2007 17:26:00 Two grounds (at most) on which it’s justified to kill another person without his consent 1. in punishment for something he did 2. in self defense or defense of another (1) it’s permissible to kill combatants in war (2) it’s impermissible to kill enemy noncombatants Anscombe-Ramsey approach: anayses the combatant/noncombatant distinction between criminals and non-criminals civilian war supporters guilty - involuntary
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Background image of page 2
Background image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: not guilty conscripts combatant --- noncombatants fullenwider: threat --- not threat Fullenwider: analyzes the combatant-noncombatant distinction between those closely associated w. a lethal threat and those who are not mob gives A a motive to kill B. A attacks B. B kills A to repel the attack. Mob = noncombatants A = combatants Threat to Bs life = war 07/10/2007 17:26:00 07/10/2007 17:26:00...
View Full Document

Page1 / 3

Philosophy 140 - not guilty conscripts combatant ---...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online