sweatshop evidence - generally better upholders of...

Info iconThis preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
In support of sweatshops Nicholas Kristof says the unsayable in The New York Times: “It’s catastrophic for muddle-minded liberals to join in and cudgel impoverished workers for whom a sweatshop job is the first step on life’s escalator.” I remember the BBC report he cites which led to Nike leaving Cambodia. It did explain that the low-paid factory jobs were far preferable for Cambodian girls to the sex trade or staying in their impoverished villages. But the outcry that followed the accurate report overlooked those realities. Phil Jones offers an intelligent reply to Kristof’s argument. I agree that the first condition — ensuring adequate health and safety standards, even in “sweatshops” — is fundamental. I know there have been documented cases of global corporations violating these standards, but from what I’ve seen in the developing world, multinationals are
Background image of page 1
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: generally better upholders of standards than local companies. I dont think this is altruism on their part. They are worried about reputational damage if they have woefully low standards. As to the disparity between advocating openness for western manufacturers while slamming the door shut on the souths agricultural exports, I couldnt agree more. See Davos Newbies passim . On Phils other points, there are no easy answers and hes right to say there is need for more research. What I object to in less intelligent viewpoints is the arrogance that we need to save the worlds poor from exploitation by neo-colonialist corporations. That smacks of the white mans burden fallacy. http://www.davosnewbies.com/2002/06/...
View Full Document

Ask a homework question - tutors are online