Article Summary.docx - 1 Student's Name Professor's Name...

1
Student's Name
Professor's Name
Course Code
Due Date
Article Summary
My primary source reading is "Why Morality is Not Relative" by James Rachels.
Contrary to our presumptions and beliefs, the idea that there is such a thing as morality is
irrelevant to our inquiry. Each individual adheres to a defined code of behavior. Ethical
relativists dispute this viewpoint because, opposite to it, they argue that each culture has its
own distinct set of moral norms. As described, these relativists conflate disparities in morality
and culture, or they are hesitant to correctly comprehend the civilizations they are defending.
Two main types of relativism exist: ethical and cultural. Even though this line of reasoning is
incorrect and hence erroneous, both rely on the concept that cultural differences are
significant. Every culture adheres to universally recognized moral principles, even though the
world's various civilizations are distinct from one another, and each has its traditions. These
standards contribute significantly to the development of society.