This preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Mathematics 105, Spring 2004 — Midterm Exam #1 Comments (1b) Give an example of a function f : R 3 → R 1 such that f is not differentiable at a = (0 , , 0), but all partial derivatives D i f ( a ) do exist. Comment : A common answer was f ( x, y, z ) = xyz/ p x 2 + y 2 + z 2 if ( x, y, z ) 6 = 0, and f (0 , , 0) = 0. This doesn’t work. Indeed,  f ( x, y, z )  ≤  ( x, y, z )  2 , and hence f (0 , , 0) equals the zero matrix (by problem (1c)). Some students wrote formulas like xyz/ p x 2 + y 2 + z 2 without addressing the issue of division by zero. It’s necessary to explicitly define f (0 , , 0). Several used f ( x, y, z ) = xy/ p x 2 + y 2 , and attempted to deal with the issue of division by zero by saying that the formula defines f when ( x, y ) 6 = (0 , 0), and defined f ( x, y, z ) = 0 whenever ( x, y ) 6 = (0 , 0). This doesn’t handle the problem of division by zero; the denominator p x 2 + y 2 vanishes at every point of the form (0 , , z ), not only at (0 , , 0). (3a) Let R = [ a, b ] × [ c, d ] be a closed, bounded rectangle in R 2 . Suppose that f is a continuously differentiable function defined in some open set containing...
View
Full
Document
This note was uploaded on 05/07/2008 for the course MATH 105 taught by Professor Michaelchrist during the Spring '04 term at University of California, Berkeley.
 Spring '04
 MichaelChrist
 Derivative

Click to edit the document details