Civil procedure - 2nd semester Rossi

Civil procedure - 2nd semester Rossi - Civil Procedure I...

Info icon This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

Civil Procedure I. Judgments A. 3 requirements for valid judgment 1. SMJ – fed q/ diversity a. Diversity—must be complete diversity and over 75k b. Federal question—no minimum amount 2. Nexus – personal JD (territorial)/Notice – opportunity to be heard a. Minimum contacts b. Territorial c. Opportunity to be heard 3. Venue--§1391 a. Where D resides or where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred B. Direct vs. Collateral attack 1. Direct a. 50(b) – motion for directed verdict b. 59(a) – motion for new trial c. 60(b) – motion to vacate judgment d. Appeal 2. Collateral – separate proceeding to attack judgment – can’t collaterally attack if already raised in 1 st C. Lack of Competency exists when: 1. court not empowered to entertain such cases 2. Judge by laws of state has no power to deal with subject matter 3. JD amount not met A. When Raised 4. court or parties at any time even party who invokes SMJ can challenge after judgment 5. If A B, can raise SMJ after statute of lim has run, to bar A from raising in proper JD 6. Can’t agree to SMJ – nonwaivable! 7. If SMJ raised once, can’t raise again on collateral attack b/c RJ, even if 1 st court erroneous! b. When claim is already litigated it can only be collaterally attacked on the basis of SMJ (as long as it wasn’t brought up in the prior action—BUT if it was only a default judgment, then it can be attacked on any of the 3 bases of a valid judgment II. SMJ D. Intro – “cases and controversies arising under fed const or treaties/laws 1. Art III § 1331 – gives broad discretion to courts 2. 1331 – limited by 3 requirements a. Well pleaded complaint rule –Mottley must be in complaint as basis of cause of action b. must be more than mere ingredient essential and directly on federal law c. substantially and not frivolous Bell v Hood – not made for sole purpose of getting JD 1) Bell v Hood – trespass suit but claim alleges violation of 5 th and 14 th Am. a) Rule – P may choose which laws to bring claim under, therefore, if issue may be decided by federal court b/c substantial and not frivolous , then court has SMJ b) Whether damages may be had for Const violation is a merits decision on 12(b)(6),not (b)(1) 1. if it were 12(b)(1) it would not be on the merits and there would be no problem for RJ
Image of page 1

Info icon This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

Image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.
  • Fall '06
  • The Land, Supreme Court of the United States, U.S. state

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

What students are saying

  • Left Quote Icon

    As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

    Student Picture

    Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

    Student Picture

    Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

  • Left Quote Icon

    The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

    Student Picture

    Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern