defensive preemption

defensive preemption - The strategy of Defensive Preemption...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
The strategy of Defensive Preemption can be articulated as being a strategy in which the United States defends its own security and vital interests at all costs, even if and when this means the use of nuclear weapons, unconventional warfare, brute force, armed influence, and preemptive strikes on other countries, figureheads, or organizations. The strategy of Defensive Preemption includes the idea of keeping all options open when deciding how and when to defend the United States, much like the “flexible response” doctrine of the Kennedy and Johnson administrations. The doctrine of Defensive Preemption includes the idea of that in order to defend the United States, we must diplomatically (when possible) or militarily (when necessary) eliminate threats where they originate before they have the chance to become a devastating attack on the United States. Preferably, this policy will be carried out multilaterally, however when multilateralism fails, the United States can and should unilaterally make decisions and take action concerning its own security. In essence, this strategy states that we must bring the war to the enemy before the enemy brings the war to us. This strategy also includes the idea that once we have eliminated a specific immediate threat, we must do everything in our power to assure our own security in both the near and distant future, including creating environments in which threats to the United States will not grow, but will die out on their own. In many cases, this idea includes the spread of democracy. Inherent in this grand strategy is the idea that we must be willing to pay a price for freedom and security now so that we do not have to pay an even greater price for freedom and security later, hence the idea of preemption. In my opinion, this strategy can be viewed as a continuation of previous grand strategies, particularly the “Prevailing” strategy implemented by the Reagan Administration, which, subsequently, was a continuation of previous grand strategies such as the Truman Administration’s “Sword and Shield,” Eisenhower’s “New Look,” Nixon’s “Strategy of Sufficiency,” and Carter’s “Countervailing Strategy.” The ideas and developments made by these strategies have logically culminated into the current grand strategy of Defensive Preemption, a strategy which can not only be used to ensure the security of the United States, but will also be useful in cementing the security of the world, especially those countries and peoples whose interests do not threaten the security of the United States. Prior to the invasion in Iraq, the United States as well as most other countries in
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 05/16/2008 for the course CALIFORNIA Articles taught by Professor Byalearoach during the Spring '08 term at UCSD.

Page1 / 3

defensive preemption - The strategy of Defensive Preemption...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online