THESIS DEFENSE RUBRICGroup:_4____Date of Defense:_January 20 2023__Research Title:THE EFFECT OF MATH SUBJECT TO SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STEM STUDENTS’ EMOTIONAL WELL-BEING INEDUCATIONAL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTEInstructions for Thesis Committee Chair:For each rubric row (i.e. Organization Rubric, Presentation Rubric, etc.),1. Assign a numeric score, listed at the top of the column, depending on the committee member’s choice (i.e.,Excellent = 4, Very Good = 3, etc.).2. Total the scores from each committee member’s rubric form for that rubric row, then average them. E.g.Committee Member A scored a 4, Member B scored a 3, Member C scored a 4, so their total is 11 and theaverage is 3.67.3. Record this average score on the Thesis Defense Report form in the appropriate “Score by area” cell.Oral Defense:Excellent (4)Very Good (3)Satisfactory (2)Unsatisfactory (1)OrganizationRubricVery logical, coherent, completeGenerally logical, mostly coherent,generally completeA bit scattered but acceptable,somewhat coherent, occasionallyscrambled, some noticeable omissionsbut still understandableRather hard to follow, significantomissions and/or substitutionsScore:PresentationRubricClear, precise, convincing,articulate, good audienceconnectionMostly clear, good grasp of material,only occasional stumbles, minoruncertainty on some facts or detailsOccasional confusion or lack of clarity,occasional gaps in theory or importantdetails, somewhat nervous or jitteryA lot of confusion, not in control of factsand key details, very nervous and stiff,frequently at a loss for wordsScore:Public Q&ARubricQuickly grasped questions, clear andapt responses, good control of boththeory and findingsOccasionally misunderstood aquestion, responses usually goodthough occasionally vague, generallyapt grasp of question and how toanswerSome misunderstanding ofquestions, responsesmaybevague or inaccurate, did not alwaysgive a full response, may answer adifferent questionFrequently misunderstood a question,incorrect or inadequate responses,
