AMST 101 week 6 presentation

AMST 101 week 6 presentation - Erica Goldberger 10-4-07...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Erica Goldberger 10-4-07 Week 6 Presentation The readings this week discussed the benefits and disadvantages that Wal-Mart brings to society. The UC Berkeley Labor Center study concludes that Wal-Mart is actually “shifting part of its labor costs onto the public.” The study claims that Wal-Mart employees are encouraged to rely on government safety-net programs, especially for healthcare rather than use the company’s plan. Since these programs are funded by taxes, the more Wal-Mart employees, the more tax-payers must pay for their healthcare. There is also clear evidence showing that Wal-Mart employees consistently receive lower wages than unionized workers at other large retail stores. The next two readings follow a debate between Wal-Mart and the UC Labor Study. Wal-Mart claims that the study was biased and funded by unions, which are out to attack Wal-Mart. Meanwhile, the researchers argue that the facts remain the facts, and three years later Wal-Mart employee wages and insured rates are significantly lower than those of unionized grocery workers. The argument goes back
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 10/22/2007 for the course AMST 101gm taught by Professor Saito during the Fall '07 term at USC.

Page1 / 2

AMST 101 week 6 presentation - Erica Goldberger 10-4-07...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online