F07Phil2H2 - Phil 2, August 29, 2007 The road to...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Phil 2, August 29, 2007 The road to utilitarianism: First conclusion (Hedonism): What is good for us as an end is pleasure, and what is bad for us as an end is pain. The distinction between what is good as a means and what is good as an end: Good as a means : good because of it helps to bring about something else that is good. But this chain of means has to end somewhere. There has to be something that is: Good as an end : good because of what it is in itself and not because of what it brings about. Second conclusion (Aggregation): The outcomewhat happensis better if the sum of what is good for each person minus what is bad for each person is greater. Third conclusion (Consequentialism): We are morally required to do what would produce the best outcome. If we put all three conclusions together, we get: Pure Utilitarianism: We are morally required to do what would produce the greatest total of pleasure minus pain....
View Full Document

Page1 / 2

F07Phil2H2 - Phil 2, August 29, 2007 The road to...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online