Sampling Distributions S08

Sampling Distributions S08 - STAT E-50 - Introduction to...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–4. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
STAT E-50 - Introduction to Statistics Sampling Distribution Models; Confidence Intervals for Proportions Notation: p Proportion, or probability of “success” in the model q Probability of “failure” in the model (p + q = 1, so q = 1 - p) ˆ p Observed proportion of “success” in the data ˆ q Observed proportion of “failure” in the data ( ) ˆˆ q1p = The Sampling Distribution of a Sample Statistic The sampling distribution model shows the behavior of the statistic over all possible samples of a population. The samples must all be the same size, and the sample statistic can be any descriptive sample statistic. Page 1 The Sampling Distribution Model for a Proportion Provided that the sampled values are independent and the sample size is large enough, the sampling distribution of ˆ p is modeled by a Normal model with ± mean ˆ μ (p) = p ± standard deviation pq ˆ SD (p) n = Assumptions: The sampled values must be independent of each other The sample size, n, must be large enough Conditions you can check: 1. 10% Condition If sampling is not with replacement, the sample size, n, must be no larger than 10% of the population. 2. Success/Failure Condition The sample size must be large enough so that np 10 and nq 10
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
1. The development of viral hepatitis subsequent to a blood transfusion can cause serious complications. The article “Hepatitis in Patients with Acute Non-lymphatic Leukemia” ( Amer. J. of Med. (1983): 413-421) reported that in spite of careful screening for those having an hepatitis antigen, viral hepatitis occurs in 7% of blood recipients. Here are the results of several simulations of sampling with 500 samples each, of different sample sizes, using p = .07: Page 2
Background image of page 2
2. Assume that the proportion of all blood recipients stricken with viral hepatitis is .07. Suppose that a new treatment is believed to reduce the incidence of viral hepatitis. This treatment is given to 200 blood recipients, only 6 of whom contract hepatitis. Does this result indicate that the true (long-run) proportion of patients who contract hepatitis after the experimental treatment is less than .07, or could this result be plausibly attributed to sample variability? What do we want to know? If the treatment is ineffective, how likely is it that only 6 of the 200 patients would have contracted viral hepatitis?
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 4
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 12

Sampling Distributions S08 - STAT E-50 - Introduction to...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 4. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online