This preview shows page 1. Sign up to view the full content.
Unformatted text preview: Why is this assumption logical, though problematic? Use 76 or 05 versions of King Kong as an example. 2. Distinguish between French Freud (Lacan) and American ego psychology (traditional Freud--id, ego, super ego, etc). 3. Compare/contrast a traditional Freudian reading of either King Kong 76 or 05 with a possible Lacanian reading. 4. What does it mean to say that the unconscious is structured like a language? How is this relevant to film study? 5. What does it mean to say that, from a Lacanian perspective, the idea of film-as-a-window-on-the-world is barred to a viewer? (Hint: has to do with the relationship of the conscious to the unconscious.)...
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 05/31/2008 for the course COMM 250 taught by Professor Manloveclifford during the Spring '08 term at Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
- Spring '08