CFO-08-21-03 - Who Rules Accounting The latest in the...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Who Rules Accounting? The latest in the regulatory struggle between FASB and Congress over the expensing of stock options. Craig Schneider CFO Magazine 21-August-2003 Dennis Beresford is having flashbacks these days, and they are anything but pleasant. Congress is once again trying to derail the Financial Accounting Standards Board's efforts to require companies to expense stock options. And for the former FASB chairman, the lawmakers' moves are a painful reminder of what happened during his tenure at the board's helm nearly a decade ago. "It's déjà vu all over again," says Beresford, now a professor of accounting at the University of Georgia. Under intense pressure from Capitol Hill, FASB under Beresford backed off of a similar proposal in 1994, compromising not only the board's position on expensing but its very independence as a standard setter. It took years for the board to buck congressional pressure again, this time on new, far-reaching rules on derivatives and business combinations. Of course, FASB's submission to Congress did nothing to prevent lawmakers from scolding the board for the cautious pace of its its deliberations on accounting issues related to the Enron scandal. No one in Washington, D.C., claims to desire an end to the independent setting of accounting rules, at least in public. The legislators insist they are merely trying to aid the struggling economy by encouraging greater use of entrepreneurial incentives. But will keeping stock options off the income statement have the desired effect? Many observers contend that while FASB's 1994 decision not to require options expensing may have inspired entrepreneurs, it also certainly motivated executives to pump up their companies' stock prices by whatever means necessary. In fact, the widespread use of nonexpensed stock options is generally thought to have led not to economic strength, but to inflated stock-market valuations, excessive executive compensation, accounting frauds, bankruptcies, and the loss of approximately $5 trillion. Some managers may welcome congressional efforts to reinflate the stock- market bubble, but forcing FASB to back down on options could instead undermine whatever confidence in the financial markets investors have since regained. "The capital markets need high-quality, unbiased information to make allocation and pricing decisions," says FASB board member G. Michael Crooch. "Managing accounting data for some hoped-for economic result is too risky and dangerous." A Simple Bill The current fight is still in its early stages. Until recently, in fact, the latest debate over expensing was limited to arcane issues involving valuation methodology. But now Congress has reentered
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
the picture, and its legislative steps would render the outcome of the debate about valuation methods all but moot. At first glance, the bill introduced in March by Rep. David Dreier (R-Calif.) and co-sponsored
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Page1 / 9

CFO-08-21-03 - Who Rules Accounting The latest in the...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online