This
preview
has intentionally blurred sections.
Sign up to view the full version.
This
preview
has intentionally blurred sections.
Sign up to view the full version.
This
preview
has intentionally blurred sections.
Sign up to view the full version.
This
preview
has intentionally blurred sections.
Sign up to view the full version.
This
preview
has intentionally blurred sections.
Sign up to view the full version.
This
preview
has intentionally blurred sections.
Sign up to view the full version.
Unformatted text preview: fear that if they gave the wrong answers, they could be killed. In addition, the questioners and the speakers often came from different cultural backgrounds, and may not have understood one another completely. Nonetheless, these texts offer a rare glimpse of an Indian perspective on colonization. In these documents, “pueblos” could refer to towns, to tribes, or to all the Indian peoples collectively. When the documents refer to “the religious,” the speakers meant Spanish-speaking monks and priests. While you read, think about why the Indians seem to have rebelled, why the rebellion succeeded for a while when so many other attempts at resistance failed, and also why might the Spanish have been allowed to return in the 1690s....
View
Full Document
- Spring '08
- S.Romney
- History, Colonialism, New Mexico, Pueblo Revolt Documents
-
Click to edit the document details