Unformatted text preview: Also is reduction ad absurdum, which is also used in math for the purpose of ‘indirect proofs’, where the mathematician must assume one aspect to be true, then complete the proof to show at the end that it contradicts the original premise or contains an absurdity, such as a square circle. Reduction and contradiction is also a good argument form to use. What also comes into play is language; the diction of a philosopher can have many implications. The way implications are made is called pragmatics, while the structure of information is known as semantics....
View Full Document
This note was uploaded on 06/09/2008 for the course PHIL 101 taught by Professor Nagel during the Spring '08 term at Brown.
- Spring '08