PHI2396 - Notes on general and specific beneficence and nonmalificence

PHI2396 - Notes on general and specific beneficence and nonmalificence

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
General and Specific Beneficence: Specific beneficence: refers to beneficent act directed towards those who fulfill special relationships to us, and or arise in specific situations (THESE ARE OBLIGED BENFICENCE) I.E. PARENTS CHILDREN (They are responsible for their existence) PHYSICIAN PATIENTS (They are responsible to help them) (1) Rescue, (2) roles/relationships General Beneficence: refers to beneficent acts directed toward those with who we have NO SPECIAL connection with; except morally. (1) Reciprocity Obligations of general beneficence: Ross says. ..” sending money to kids in Africa is important” Shelly Keagan: she promotes overall good - She says there is no limit on beneficent obligations - Thinks ideal beneficence and supererogatory acts should be put in with obligatory beneficence. Criticism: too idealistic, impractical, morally wrong (to have to choose between your children and a stranger)
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Peter Singer: obligation to benefit to the EXTENT that the suffering caused to oneself
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 06/17/2008 for the course PHI 2396 taught by Professor Young during the Winter '08 term at University of Ottawa.

Page1 / 4

PHI2396 - Notes on general and specific beneficence and nonmalificence

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online