Cupreme Court Procedures

Cupreme Court Procedures - 6.03 Supreme Court Procedures 1....

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
6.03 – Supreme Court Procedures 1. Name the case and the docket number. Rockwell International, Corp., et al. v. U.S., docket #05-1272. 2. Summarize the issues in the case. In 1989 James Stone sued his former employers, Rockwell International, for selling the government fraudulent cement blocks filled with nuclear waste. Under the False Claims Act, which provides a “qui tam” provision, private citizens, whether affiliated with the government or not, are allowed to sue for the government in such fraud cases, and be paid a percentage of the recovery (typically 15-25 percent). The courts determined that the transaction was indeed fraudulent, and Stone was initially awarded $1.4 million of recovery damages. Later, in 1999, the district court entered the amount at nearly $4.2 million, or triple the amount. What’s now in question under the Supreme Court, after being appealed repeatedly, is whether Stone was an “original” source of information as defined by the act, or simply a “bounty hunter,” and whether he is entitled to his share of recovery damages. 3. Why does this case interest you? I want to study business in college, so naturally big company fraud cases interest me. 4. If you were on the court, how would you decide this case? I would award Stone the money. The companies would have to pay the government damages anyway, so they must have an ulterior motive to be trying to prevent Stone from getting his share. Besides, several investigations were made, and they generally conclude that Stone’s “whistleblowing” isn’t parasitic – he actually wrote reports, prior to the contract, stating that the nuclear waste within the bricks would eventually spill out. Additionally, granting Stone the money would encourage behaviors similar to his, reducing further fraud in the future. Response to Andrew MacInnes:
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 06/26/2008 for the course PSCI 130-001 taught by Professor Diiulio during the Fall '08 term at UPenn.

Page1 / 4

Cupreme Court Procedures - 6.03 Supreme Court Procedures 1....

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online