Econ313prelim1SolSpring084

# Econ313prelim1SolSpring084 - Econ313-1 Spring 2008 Talia...

This preview shows pages 1–4. Sign up to view the full content.

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: Econ313-1 Spring 2008 Talia Bar Prelim 1, suggested solution Question 1 (30 minutes) max A;Y A s & Y 1 & s s:t:A;Y Â¡ and p A A + p Y Y = m Interior solution since C-D utility. We solve the system: sY (1 Â¢ s ) A = p A p Y p A A + p Y Y = m b. The solution to the system above is. MRS condition implies p Y Y = (1 Â¢ s ) p A A s Substitution into the budget 1 p A A + (1 & s ) p A A s = m sp A A + (1 & s ) p A A = sm A = sm p A : Y = (1 & s ) m p Y : Given our parameter values: A = 1 4 Â¡ 60 3 4 = 20 Y = 3 4 Â¡ 60 1 = 45 : c. Using the demand for A; we need A = 1 4 & b m 3 4 = 30 ) b m = 90 : The cost of this policy is 90 & 60 = 30 per student. c. 2 A = sm c p A = 1 4 & 60 c p A = 30 ) c p A = 1 2 : Cost of the policy is 30 & ( 3 4 Â¡ 1 2 ) = 7 : 5 d. The price subsidy achieves the A = 30 goal with lower cost to the academy than the increase in cafeteria . Intuitively, the &rst policy increases consumption of apples only through an income e/ect. The second policy lowers the price of good 1, hence, money spent on this subsidy increases demand for apples in two ways, an income e/ect, and a...
View Full Document

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

### Page1 / 9

Econ313prelim1SolSpring084 - Econ313-1 Spring 2008 Talia...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 4. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document
Ask a homework question - tutors are online