LawReview2 - What are the boundaries, perks, and...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
What are the boundaries, perks, and obligations of representation? - Sections 7, 8a1, and 8a3 of the NLRA protect certain activities undertaken by employees  acting together.  Usually, these activities involve a collective bargaining relationship,  but the law protects “concerted activity,” even if it falls short of that goal. - Are workers who wish to speak out together, but are not interested in union  representation, also protected from reprisal by their employer? - Since 1914, federal legislation has repeatedly affirmed the legality of workers acting  in concert in order to change the terms and conditions of their employment: - The Clayton Act of 1914 exempts labor organizations from antitrust provisions, in  part because “the labor of a human being is not a commodity or article of  commerce.” - The Norris LaGuardia Act of 1932 withdraws the jurisdiction of federal courts to  issue injunctions in labor disputes, except to the extent necessary to curtail  violence or fraud, because, in the words of section 2, “the individual unorganized  worker is commonly helpless to exercise actual liberty of contract and to protect  his freedom of labor, and thereby to obtain acceptable terms and conditions of  employment.” - The Railway Labor Act of 1926 requires railway and airline companies to bargain  with labor organizations when a majority of company workers have chosen  collective representation. - The NLRA imposes a bargaining obligation on employers in private industry and,  in section 7, recognizes for workers “the right to self-organization, to form, join or  assist labor organizations, to bargain collectively through representatives of their  own choosing, and to engage in concerted activities for the purpose of collective  bargaining and other mutual aid and protection.” - NLRB v. City Disposal Systems     : - Facts: - 1984, Supreme Court  - Employee James Brown refused to drive a truck he believed to be unsafe; he  was later dismissed. - The collective bargaining agreement contained a promise from City Disposal  Systems that employees not be asked to drive unsafe trucks. - Legal Issues: - When an employee invokes a right grounded in a collective bargaining  agreement, is he or she engaging in concerted activity? -
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 03/10/2008 for the course ILRCB 2010 taught by Professor Lieberwitzr during the Fall '07 term at Cornell University (Engineering School).

Page1 / 5

LawReview2 - What are the boundaries, perks, and...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online