SOLUTION PS6

SOLUTION PS6 - second distribution to the first, you would...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–5. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Eco 100 Problem set # 6 Do the following problems: On page 429 of Mankiw, problem #6 (explain your views concisely – there is room for valid differences of opinion here) On page 429 of Mankiw, problem #8. On page 451 of Mankiw, problem #3.
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
On page 451 of Mankiw, problem #7 (include the views of John Hicks and Pareto as well). John Hicks would prefer the first distribution because Hicksian social welfare measure adds up everyone’s real income with no concern about distribution, and the total income is higher in the first distribution ($280,000) compared to the second distribution ($250,000). Pareto developed ideas of efficiency rather than equity. If you go from the first distribution to the second, you would be making 9 people worse off and 1 person better off. If you go from the
Background image of page 2
Background image of page 3

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Background image of page 4
Background image of page 5
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: second distribution to the first, you would be making 9 people better off and 1 person worse off. So both distributions could be considered Pareto optimal, since no change can make someone better off without making someone else worse off. On page 452 of Mankiw, problem #10. On page 452 of Mankiw, problem #11. On page 340 of Mankiw, problem #4. On page 342 of Mankiw, problem #9. On page 342 of Mankiw, problem #13. NOTE: For part a), total revenue should be $2,100 + $800 = $2,900. d. For part a), adults are still charged $7 and children $4, the total revenue remains $2,900, but the profit is now $400. For part b), you would not put on the play because if the price is set at $7, but there is a loss of $400. For part c), everyone is worse off....
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 07/09/2008 for the course ECO 100 taught by Professor R.willig during the Spring '08 term at Princeton.

Page1 / 5

SOLUTION PS6 - second distribution to the first, you would...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 5. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online