sect10_pros_memo - SECTION 10 ATTEMPT LIABILITY Attempt v...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
S ECTION 10: A TTEMPT L IABILITY – O CTOBER 10, 2006 Attempt v. Mere Preparation - Determine point of criminal liability o Some point in chain of events from thinking about committing an offense to completing it o Point where mere preparation becomes a criminal attempt - Act may escape liability for attempt if he voluntarily and completely renounces the attempt Proximity Tests – refer to footnotes - Physical proximity doctrine o How close to the location of contemplated conduct - Dangerous proximity doctrine o How close the danger was to happening - Indispensable element approach - Probable desistance test o Chance of actor reasonably desisting - All measure the point of attempt by the actor’s closeness to commission of the substantive offense - Objective view of criminality: o Requires harm or evil Tangible or intangible o Does not require the actual occurrence of the offense o Requires that the actor actually have come close to committing the offense o Requires a real present danger that the offense will be committed Res Ipsa Loquitur Test - Unequivocality test - Focuses on the actor’s conduct manifestation of the actor’s intent o Not on how close the actor actually comes to committing the substantive offense - Preparation is intent - Conduct speaks for itself o Excludes all other innocent possibilities (possible conduct) - Attempt liability depends upon the actor’s intention to commit the offense - Res ipsa test will bar attempt liability even if evidence of culpability is overwhelming o If that culpability does not show in the actor’s conduct Substantial Step Test - Actor must take a “substantial step” toward commission of the offense - How far from the pure intention to commit the offense the actor has gone - Actor’s conduct must “strongly corroborative of the actor’s criminal purpose” 1
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
o Need only corroborate his or her intent o Help support in a modest way the existence of the alleged intent - Subjective view of Criminality o Actual danger of commission is not required Culpability Requirements: Criminalizing otherwise Innocent Conduct - Culpability requirements core of offense - Objective elements can be satisfied by conduct that otherwise would be lawful o Made criminal by virtue of the attempter’s culpable state of mind - One’s intention can make otherwise innocent conduct criminal Specific Intent Requirement - Attempt said to be a “specific intent offense” o Requiring a higher level of culpable state of mind than a “general intent” offense General intent – actor’s intention could be assumed from his or her conduct o Specific intent requirement of attempt typically is taken to require a purpose to commit the object offense Purpose Requirement in Attempt - Murder requires only that the actor knew his acts created a strong probability of causing death of great bodily harm o Attempted murder requires this also - Attempt liability requires that: o Actor intend to engage in the conduct constituting the substantive offense
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

Page1 / 9

sect10_pros_memo - SECTION 10 ATTEMPT LIABILITY Attempt v...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online