Relativity Notes 2006

Relativity Notes 2006 - 1 Physics 200a Relativity notes...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Unformatted text preview: 1 Physics 200a Relativity notes Shankar (2006) Let us go over how the Lorentz transformation was derived and what it represents. An event is something that happens at a denite time and place, like a recracker going o. Let us say I assign to it coordinates ( x,t ) and you, moving to the right at velocity u , assign coordinates ( x ,t ). It is assumed that when you, sitting at x = 0 passed me (sitting at x = 0), we set our clocks to zero: t = t = 0. Thus our origins in space-time coincide. Let us see how the coordinates would have been related in pre-Einstein days . First, once we synchronize clocks at t = t = 0, they remain synchronized for all future times t = t . This is the notion of absolute time we all believe in our daily life. You will assign to the event the spatial coordinates x = x-ut. (1) This relationship is easy to understand: your origin is ut meters to the right of mine (Figure (2)) because you have been moving to the right at velocity u for time t so the x-coordinate you assign to an event will be less by ut compared to what I assign. You can invert this relation to say x = x + ut. (2) How are these two equations modied post-Einstein? If the velocity of light is to be same for both you and me, it is clear we do not agree on lengths or times or both. Thus if I predict you will say the event is at x = x-ut , you will say that my lengths need to be modied by a factor so that the correct answer is x = ( x-ut ) . (3) x x' S S' ut FIG. 1. The same event (solid dot) is assigned coordinates ( x,t ) by me (S) and ( x ,t ) by you (S). In the pre-E-instein days t = t not only initially (when our origins crossed) but always. 2 Likewise when you predict I will say x = x + ut I will say, No, your lengths are o, so the correct result is x = ( x + ut ) . (4) Note two things. First, I leave open the option that the time elapsed be-tween when we synchronized clocks and when the recracker went o is t for you and t for me, with two times being possibly dierent. Next, the fudge factor for converting your lengths to mine and mine to yours are the same . This comes from the postulate that both observers are equivalent. So let us look at the equations we have: x = ( x + ut ) (5) x = ( x-ut ) . (6) We proceed to nail down as follows. The event in question was a re cracker going o. Suppose when our origins coincided we sent o a light pulse that this pulse set o the recracker. Since the light pulse took t seconds to travel x meters according to me and took t seconds to go x meters according to you and we both agree on the value of c , it must be true for this particular event that x = ct and x = ct . (7) Let us multiply the LHS of Eqn 5 by the LHS of 6 and equate the result to the product of the RHSs to get xx = 2 ( xx + xut-x ut-u 2 tt ) , and upon setting x = ct, x = ct we get (8) c 2 tt = 2 ( c 2 tt + uctt-uct t-u 2 tt ) and now upon cancelling tt (9) 2 = 1 1-u 2 c 2...
View Full Document

This note was uploaded on 07/13/2008 for the course PHYS 200 taught by Professor Ramamurtishankar during the Fall '08 term at Yale.

Page1 / 19

Relativity Notes 2006 - 1 Physics 200a Relativity notes...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online