finalans03

# finalans03 - The Ohio State University Department of...

This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

The Ohio State University Department of Economics Econ 805 Final Exam Answers Professor Peck Winter 2003 Here is the distribution of scores on the …nal exam: 100 6 90-99 5 80-89 6 70-79 4 60-69 6 50-59 6 40-49 7 30-39 8 1. Consider a pure exchange economy, which we will call the n-consumer economy, with k goods and n consumers. Each consumer’s utility function and endowment vector satis…es assumption A: Assumption A: The utility function is continuous, strictly monotonic, and strictly quasi-concave. The endowment vector is strictly positive. Now consider the pure exchange economy in which an n + 1 st consumer, whose utility function and endowment also satis…es assumption A, joins the original n consumers. We call this economy the n+1-consumer economy. For the statements in (a) and (b), either sketch the argument for why the statement is true, or give a counterexample if the statement is false. (a) (15 points) For all i = 1 ; :::; n , consumer i receives at least as high a utility level at the competitive equilibrium of the n+1-consumer economy than at the competitive equilibrium of the n-consumer economy. (b) (15 points) Suppose that the initial endowment allocation of the n- consumer economy is Pareto optimal. Then for all i = 1 ; :::; n , consumer i receives at least as high a utility level at the competitive equilibrium of the n+1-consumer economy than at the competitive equilibrium of the n-consumer economy. Answer: (a) This statement is false. While it is possible for all of the …rst n consumers to be better o¤ at the C.E. of the n+1-consumer economy, we 1

This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full Document
can …nd a counterexample. For example, let k=2 and n=2 hold, and consider the following utility functions and endowments: u 1 ( x 1 ) = log( x 1 1 ) + log( x 2 1 ) ; ! 1 = (2 ; 1) u 2 ( x 2 ) = log( x 1 2 ) + log( x 2 2 ) ; ! 2 = (1 ; 2) u 3 ( x 3 ) = log( x 1 3 ) + log( x 2 3 ) ; ! 3 = (2 ; 1) : It is easy to check that consumer 1 receives a higher utility, in the C.E. to the economy with consumers 1 and 2, than in the C.E. to the economy with all three consumers. Intuitively, the introduction of consumer 3 creates an unfavorable price shift, making the good that consumer 1 wants to buy more expensive relative to the good that consumer 1 wants to sell.
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

{[ snackBarMessage ]}

### What students are saying

• As a current student on this bumpy collegiate pathway, I stumbled upon Course Hero, where I can find study resources for nearly all my courses, get online help from tutors 24/7, and even share my old projects, papers, and lecture notes with other students.

Kiran Temple University Fox School of Business ‘17, Course Hero Intern

• I cannot even describe how much Course Hero helped me this summer. It’s truly become something I can always rely on and help me. In the end, I was not only able to survive summer classes, but I was able to thrive thanks to Course Hero.

Dana University of Pennsylvania ‘17, Course Hero Intern

• The ability to access any university’s resources through Course Hero proved invaluable in my case. I was behind on Tulane coursework and actually used UCLA’s materials to help me move forward and get everything together on time.

Jill Tulane University ‘16, Course Hero Intern