(Teamwork Scoring)

(Teamwork Scoring) - Teamwork Scoring Rubric HRT 382 Peer...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–2. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Teamwork Scoring Rubric Evaluator’s Name: ____________ , _____________ HRT 382 Peer Evaluation Sheet Section 01 02 Last First “We are not born knowing how to work as a team, and teamwork can be difficult to learn. Perhaps this is one of the reasons that employers value so highly evidence of team skills in potential employees.” Lynda Harding, CSU Fresno. (Special thanks to Professor Harding for developing the concept of this Teamwork Rubric.) Names of Individuals Evaluated: (Circle appropriate score) Self A. Quality of Work Work could be used by the instructors as a model for other students 5 5 5 5 5 May require minor improvements, but generally is of high standard 4 4 4 4 4 Some major flaws, but flaws are fixable (and fixed) 3 3 3 3 3 Team members needed to repeat or rework some parts of this individual’s efforts 2 2 2 2 2 Work was not useable by the team 1 1 1 1 1 B. Quantity of Work Does considerable extra work 5 5 5 5 5 More than carries his or her own workload 4 4 4 4 4 Does his or her share of the work
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
Image of page 2
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

This note was uploaded on 03/10/2008 for the course HRT 382 taught by Professor Mamabell during the Spring '08 term at Cal Poly Pomona.

Page1 / 2

(Teamwork Scoring) - Teamwork Scoring Rubric HRT 382 Peer...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 2. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online