This preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.
This preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.
View Full Document
Unformatted text preview: Informal lecture notes for Dec. 4 Now that we have a solid background in the basics of complex differentiation, its time to move on to complex integration. 1 Contour integrals Consider a curve C in the complex plane parametrized by z ( t ) for a z b . Of course, we can write this in terms of its real and imaginary parts as z ( t ) = x ( t )+ iy ( t ). Now suppose we have a (complex) function f ( z ) = u ( x, y )+ iv ( x, y ). We want to integrate f along the curve C . In order to define such an integral we start, as usual, with a Riemann sum approximation. If we subdivide the curve by subdividing the interval at points a = t , t 1 , . . . , t n = b , then the corresponding Riemann sum looks like n X j =1 f ( z ( t )) ( z ( t i ) z ( t i 1 )) where the dot here refers, of course, to complex multiplication. (This is the difference with the definition of a real line integral, in which both factors are vectors and we take their dot product.) Then the contour integral of f along C , written R C f ( z ) dz , is defined to be the limit as n , assuming that this limit exists. This makes a good definition, but in order to compute with it, we will re write it in terms of the parametrization and the real and imaginary parts of f and z . A little computation shows that Z C f ( z ) dz = Z b a [ u ( x ( t ) , y ( t )) x ( t ) v ( x ( t ) , y ( t )) y ( t )] dt + i Z b a [ v ( x ( t ) , y ( t )) x ( t ) + u ( x ( t ) , y ( t )) y ( t )] dt = Z C u dx v dy + i Z C v dx + u dy. An easy way to remember this is by writing the complex differential as dz = dx + i dy and then multiplying by f ( z ) written in terms of its real and imaginary parts. Example: Let C be the quartercircle from 1 to i and let f ( z ) = z 2 . Then we can parametrize C as z ( t ) = cos t + i sin t for 0 t / 2. In terms of this parametrization, we have that f ( z ( t )) = cos 2 t sin 2 t + i (2 cos t sin t ). Further, we have dz = dx + i dy = sin t dt + i cos t dt , and thus, after some algebra, we find that f ( z ( t )) dz = sin 3 t 3 sin t cos 2 t + i ( cos 3 t 3 cos t sin 2 t ) dt = sin t 4 sin t cos 2 t + i ( cos t 4 cos t sin 2 t ) dt. 1 Note that the last line is obtained using cos 2 t = 1 sin 2 t and vice versa, and we have done this with an eye toward the fact that were about to integrate this expression. We have Z C f ( z ) dz = Z / 2 ( sin t 4 sin t cos 2 t ) dt + i Z / 2 ( cos t 4 cos t sin 2 t ) dt = cos t + 4 3 cos 3 t / 2 + i sin t 4 3 sin 3 t / 2 = 1 3 1 3 i. Before leaving this example, it is worth noting that these computations can be streamlined by taking better advantage of complex functions. In particular, this parametrization of the curve C can be rewritten as z ( t ) = e it for 0 t / 2. Then we have f ( z ( t )) = e 2 it . Further, we see that dz = ie it dt , and thus Z C f ( z ) dz = i Z / 2 e 3 it dt = i Z / 2 cos(3 t ) dt Z / 2 sin(3 t ) dt = i 1 3 sin(3 t ) / 2 + 1 3 cos(3 t ) /...
View
Full
Document
This note was uploaded on 07/25/2008 for the course MATH V1202 taught by Professor Neel during the Spring '07 term at Columbia.
 Spring '07
 NEEL
 Calculus, Integrals

Click to edit the document details