hw1_f03_sln

hw1_f03_sln - EMA 405, Fall 2003 Solutions for HW #1 1. a)...

Info iconThis preview shows pages 1–3. Sign up to view the full content.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
EMA 405, Fall 2003 Solutions for HW #1 1. a) The different arrangements of constraints on vertical displacement are outside the scope of the preliminary analysis, which has been performed in class with the equations for a long thin beam. What we do know is that the sum of the reaction forces in the x-direction is zero and the sum of the reaction forces in the y-direction is +1x10 6 N. To some extent, intuition on the distribution of forces can be guided by our preliminary computations for the distribution of σ x and τ xy from the long beam model. The σ x distribution is linear in y, with a maximum value of 36 MPa at y=h/2 and a minimum value of –36 MPa at y=-h/2 at the wall end of the beam (x=0). The τ xy distribution is parabolic in y with a peak amplitude of 3 MPa at y=0. If we divide the wall end of the beam into a set of horizontal strips, and integrate the stresses from the preliminary analysis over the strips, we can determine the average force over each strip to compare with the nodal reactions from the FEA. The top and bottom strips will have half the area of the rest of the strips, as shown below for the five nodes along the wall for the 2x6 mesh. Wall end of beam--circles represent nodes, horizontal lines indicate areas for computing reaction forces from stresses. The expected reaction forces based on stresses from the preliminary analysis are given in Table 1.1. Since these results are computed from the long beam approximation, they DO NOT include effects associated with a nonzero Poisson ratio. Table 1.1. Predicted Reaction Forces for a 2x6 Mesh—Integrated Stresses from the P.A. vertical position (m) Fx (N) Fy 1 -2.0x10 6 +0.04x10 6 0.75 -2.3x10 6 +0.27x10 6 0.5 0 +0.37x10 6 0.25 +2.3x10 6 +0.27x10 6 0 +2.0x10 6 +0.04x10 6 1/7
Background image of page 1

Info iconThis preview has intentionally blurred sections. Sign up to view the full version.

View Full DocumentRight Arrow Icon
The results for the 1x3, 2x6, and 4x12 FEA computations are provided in Tables 1.2-1.4. In all cases the sum of the x- and y-components meet our expectations for the net reaction forces. In addition, the distribution of Fx is close to our predicted distribution for the 1x3 and 2x6 meshes. However, the more refined mesh produces an Fx distribution that does not appear to result from a purely linear-in-y distribution of σ x . The computed Fy distributions are further from the predictions than the computed Fx distributions. For the 1x3 and 2x6 meshes, the sign of the computed Fy changes from node to node. This does not meet expectation, and is an indication of poor resolution. The Fy reactions from the 4x12 mesh also shows significant changes from one node to the next, but the largest forces remain at the extreme y-locations, where the largest strains associated with the nonzero Poisson ratio occur. [The Fy reaction forces in the computation with Poisson’s ratio set to zero, given in Table 1.9, are closer to the predicted distribution, but the largest forces do not occur at the mid-plane. The reason for this will become apparent when we discuss distributed loading.] Table 1.2. Computed Reaction Forces with the 1x3 mesh
Background image of page 2
Image of page 3
This is the end of the preview. Sign up to access the rest of the document.

Page1 / 7

hw1_f03_sln - EMA 405, Fall 2003 Solutions for HW #1 1. a)...

This preview shows document pages 1 - 3. Sign up to view the full document.

View Full Document Right Arrow Icon
Ask a homework question - tutors are online